# TestOwl Case Studies

Three case studies showing how teams of different sizes can move regression testing off spreadsheets and brittle scripts. These are worked examples with modelled results, not reports on real customers. Each page shows its baseline, measurement method and the arithmetic behind the savings.

## HR tech: a 22-person QA team
An HR technology company with 550 employees. Selenium automation owned by six SDETs, 980 manual regression scenarios and a five-day regression cycle. Modelled result: regression cycle 5 days to 2, person-hours per cycle 280 to 122. Read: https://testowl.ai/case-studies/hr-tech-platform-regression-at-scale

## Fintech: a 12-person QA team
A fintech product company with 275 employees. A flaky Cypress release gate, hand-built audit evidence and sensitive test data. Modelled result: regression window 3 days to 1, person-hours per release 155 to 57, CI runs with non-product failures 14% to 3%. Read: https://testowl.ai/case-studies/fintech-release-evidence-and-flaky-tests

## B2B SaaS: a 4-person QA team
A B2B SaaS company with 48 employees and no automation engineer. A spreadsheet regression checklist and an abandoned Playwright suite. Modelled result: automated regression 19% to 79%, regression cycle 2 days to half a day, tooling cost $378 a month. Read: https://testowl.ai/case-studies/b2b-saas-small-qa-team